U.S. data center comparison

Data centers by state: compare markets, power and connectivity.

Compare all 50 states on one electricity benchmark, explore the markets our guides cover, and see the buildings and networks behind the shortlist. Then narrow the choice by power delivery, rack density, carrier access and total cost.

Start with the requirement

Which states belong on your shortlist?

Use the application to choose the geography. Use the facility response to decide whether that geography can serve you. These are starting comparisons, not claims of current availability or a ranking of the best states.

Shortlist starting points by deployment requirement
RequirementMarkets to testWhat should decide it
Carrier and cloud interconnectionNorthern Virginia, Chicago, Dallas, Silicon ValleyNamed carriers and cloud on-ramps in the building, physical route diversity, cross-connect charges and latency to the endpoints you use.
Southeast enterprise usersAtlanta, Charlotte, Nashville, Alabama citiesUser latency, travel and support requirements, plus room for the next expansion in the selected building.
New York-region applicationsNew York, New Jersey and Connecticut; compare Philadelphia if latency allowsMeasured routes to users, exchanges and counterparties; transport costs can outweigh a lower facility rate.
Western enterprise deploymentCalifornia, Phoenix, Hillsboro, SeattleWhether proximity is mandatory, and the price of preserving required network connections when compute moves inland.
GPU or dense computeCompare operating halls in several regions; keep remote campus proposals in a separate searchSustained kW per rack, liquid-cooling support, contiguous electrical capacity, commissioning tests and the contract's power ramp.
Cabinets and a small cageBegin near the users and staff; compare a second metro only if the workload can moveMinimum commitment, usable power, carrier access, support response and recurring extras. A wholesale MW rate is not a cabinet budget.
A 250 kW to multi-MW suiteRun two or three metros in parallel, including a candidate with existing energized capacityThe initial committed block, expansion rights, utility dependencies and a dated delivery obligation.
Disaster recoveryCompare regions as well as buildings; choose distance from the application's recovery objectivesIndependent utility and fiber paths, shared hazards, replication latency, staffing and tested recovery procedures.
One source, one quarter

The four largest colocation metros

These are metro research figures, not statewide totals. The electricity comparison below uses a separate statewide measure.

CBRE market comparison - Q1 2026
Market / stateInventoryVacancyPublished availability250–500 kW asking rent
Northern Virginia
Virginia
4,182.0 MW0.3%10.8 MW$190–$235 / kW / month
Atlanta
Georgia
1,465.2 MW1.0%14.5 MWNo numeric band in this report
Dallas-Fort Worth
Texas
1,249.4 MW1.8%No absolute figure stated in the report textNo numeric band in this report
Chicago
Illinois
910.6 MW2.2%19.8 MW$200–$230 / kW / month

Source: CBRE Global Data Center Trends 2026, published June 17, 2026; Q1 2026 basis. Availability is the source's market measure, not an operator-confirmed offer for your density, redundancy or date. Asking rents are the source's wholesale range for the stated requirement size; compare the inclusions before using them in a budget.

Inventory measures scale. Vacancy measures how much of that defined inventory is unoccupied. Neither tells you whether one building can deliver your whole power block. A shortlist needs the operator's response for the exact room and date.

All 50 states

Compare data centers by state

Find the relevant city guides, compare one consistent electricity benchmark, then read the local differences below. States without a detailed guide remain in the table; missing coverage does not mean there are no data centers.

Electricity: EIA Table 5.6.A, July 2026, industrial sector, cents per kWh. Preliminary statewide averages, not data-center tariffs or colocation prices. Utilities can classify a data center differently. U.S. industrial average: 9.77¢/kWh.

State guide coverage and industrial electricity benchmark - July 2026
StateMarkets and guidesElectricity
¢/kWh
What to evaluate
AlabamaAlabama8.42Regional enterprise deployments and a Southeast second site
AlaskaNo dedicated state or metro guide24.81Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
ArizonaPhoenix and Mesa9.35Western enterprise capacity and compute deployments
ArkansasNo dedicated state or metro guide7.84Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
CaliforniaSilicon Valley · Los Angeles25.11Workloads that need California users, networks or operations
ColoradoDenver · Aurora9.54Mountain-region enterprise systems and regional operations
ConnecticutNew York Tri-State17.29Local enterprise access with New York-region connectivity
DelawareNo dedicated state or metro guide11.71Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
FloridaSouth Florida9.17South Florida users and international network dependencies
GeorgiaAtlanta10.03Southeast enterprise networks and larger colocation searches
HawaiiNo dedicated state or metro guide39.33Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
IdahoNo dedicated state or metro guide9.02Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
IllinoisChicago11.87Midwest networks, enterprise systems and financial applications
IndianaIndiana and New Carlisle9.16Indiana enterprise colocation and longer-term campus evaluation
IowaDes Moines and Council Bluffs9.99Regional enterprise capacity and Midwest secondary sites
KansasKansas City8.52Central U.S. enterprise deployments
KentuckyNo dedicated state or metro guide7.51Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
LouisianaNo dedicated state or metro guide6.08Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
MaineNo dedicated state or metro guide13.94Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
MarylandBaltimore and the Maryland corridor · Montgomery County, Maryland · Frederick County16.21Maryland users, local operations and Washington-region requirements
MassachusettsBoston and New England20.25New England enterprise, research and local support requirements
MichiganDetroit and Southeast Michigan9.81Michigan enterprise operations and regional recovery
MinnesotaMinneapolis and Saint Paul10.34Upper Midwest enterprise systems and local operations
MississippiNo dedicated state or metro guide7.66Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
MissouriKansas City · St. Louis · Springfield, Missouri9.87Central-region enterprise networks and Missouri operations
MontanaNo dedicated state or metro guide7.71Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
NebraskaOmaha and Sarpy County10.00Central U.S. enterprise capacity and Omaha-area operations
NevadaLas Vegas and Reno10.04Western deployments and alternatives to California
New HampshireNo dedicated state or metro guide18.17Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
New JerseyNew York Tri-State15.63New York-region enterprise capacity and network access
New MexicoNo dedicated state or metro guide4.16Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
New YorkNew York Tri-State10.81Metro users, financial applications and network-intensive systems
North CarolinaCharlotte · North Carolina outside Charlotte8.37Southeast enterprise systems and regional users
North DakotaNo dedicated state or metro guide8.21Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
OhioColumbus, Ohio · Cleveland, Akron and Northeast Ohio · Cincinnati and Dayton10.95Ohio enterprise capacity and Midwest compute searches
OklahomaOklahoma8.16Regional enterprise systems and central compute evaluation
OregonHillsboro and Portland8.92Pacific Northwest capacity and western enterprise systems
PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia · Pittsburgh · Lehigh Valley, Reading and Camp Hill11.04Pennsylvania enterprise users and Northeast regional alternatives
Rhode IslandNo dedicated state or metro guide22.86Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
South CarolinaSouth Carolina7.84Local enterprise workloads and coastal network requirements
South DakotaNo dedicated state or metro guide9.83Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
TennesseeNashville · Memphis7.13Tennessee enterprise operations and regional secondary sites
TexasDallas-Fort Worth · Austin and San Antonio · Houston7.07Central enterprise networks, regional operations and larger suites
UtahSalt Lake City and the Wasatch Front9.10Mountain-region enterprise systems and western recovery
VermontNo dedicated state or metro guide13.07Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
VirginiaNorthern Virginia · Prince William County · Richmond · Boydton and Mecklenburg County10.07East Coast interconnection and Virginia campus searches
WashingtonSeattle and Puget Sound · Central Washington7.51Pacific Northwest networks or inland compute deployments
West VirginiaNo dedicated state or metro guide8.40Electricity benchmark only; a facility shortlist needs direct verification.
WisconsinWisconsin10.46Wisconsin enterprise operations and Midwest secondary capacity
WyomingCheyenne and Laramie County8.62Power-led campus evaluation and regional enterprise requirements

Region labels follow Census regions. New York Tri-State spans New York, New Jersey and Connecticut; Kansas City spans Kansas and Missouri. Boston's guide covers the wider New England region. Washington, D.C. is not included in the 50-state table; use the Northern Virginia and Maryland guides for a Washington-region search.

Inside the state line

What changes within each state

The useful unit of comparison is the metro, utility territory and building. These profiles explain the distinctions to carry into a shortlist and show the size of our selected market collections.

How to read the market snapshots

Registered buildings and network presences are our PeeringDB snapshot dated October 22, 2026. Network presences count a network once per building, so the same network can appear repeatedly. Operating / total buildings are from our verified inventory dated September 29, 2026; total includes planned, under-construction and unknown-status buildings. Neither collection measures available capacity. A missing inventory cell means we do not cover that market in that collection. Cross-state and regional rows can recur in more than one profile; do not sum them.

Northeast

Connecticut facilities within the Tri-State search

Connecticut

Local enterprise access with New York-region connectivity

Our New York Tri-State guide includes Connecticut alongside New York and New Jersey. Its market-wide counts cannot be assigned to Connecticut alone. A facility near local operations may be useful even when the application's network exchange point remains in New York or New Jersey.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
New York Tri-State951,28889 / 97

Before requesting a quote. Compare Connecticut buildings with northern New Jersey using measured latency, remote-hands coverage and the cost of transporting traffic to required carriers. Confirm the utility and service tariff at each address. The same regional shortlist can cross a state line and change both power economics and tax treatment.

Boston and the wider New England comparison

Massachusetts

New England enterprise, research and local support requirements

Our Boston guide spans New England; its collection is not a Massachusetts-only building total. Buyers need to separate a Boston-area deployment from a more distant regional alternative. Proximity to staff, research systems and local users can justify costs that a remote compute workload would avoid.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Boston and New England67282Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Measure latency to the actual application and research endpoints. Normalize electricity recovery, remote-hands coverage and network transport when comparing New England locations. A regional electricity or network average should not stand in for the service terms at a Massachusetts address.

Northern New Jersey and Newark within the Tri-State region

New Jersey

New York-region enterprise capacity and network access

Northern New Jersey campuses and Newark carrier buildings belong in the same regional search as New York, but serve different network and space requirements. The Tri-State guide covers New York, New Jersey and Connecticut together; its counts should not be presented as New Jersey totals.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
New York Tri-State951,28889 / 97

Before requesting a quote. Measure the route to Manhattan applications, exchanges and cloud endpoints. Compare power commitments, cross-connect charges, flood exposure and migration windows at each site. A New Jersey address can reduce travel or transport costs for one workload and increase them for another.

New York City and Hudson Valley within the Tri-State guide

New York

Metro users, financial applications and network-intensive systems

New York City carrier buildings and Hudson Valley campuses should not be treated as one product. Our Tri-State collection also includes New Jersey and Connecticut, so neither the state average electricity price nor the regional building count describes a Manhattan deployment by itself.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
New York Tri-State951,28889 / 97

Before requesting a quote. Specify the exact counterparties and latency targets for financial systems. Price transport, cross-connects, support and relocation alongside space. For a larger power block, compare regional campuses using measured application latency instead of assuming every Tri-State address is equivalent.

Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and the Lehigh Valley corridor

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania enterprise users and Northeast regional alternatives

Philadelphia's eastern network geography, Pittsburgh's western enterprise base and the Lehigh Valley corridor are distinct searches. Our guides keep their collections separate. The preferred city depends on where the workload runs, where staff are based and which network endpoints must be reached.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Philadelphia18125Not covered
Pittsburgh1373Not covered
Lehigh Valley, Reading and Camp Hill710Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Measure routes to required New York, Washington or Midwest endpoints. Ask whether proposed power depends on new utility construction and which approval milestones remain. Compare transport and support coverage when moving a workload from an established carrier building to a more distant campus.

Midwest

Chicago and its western suburbs

Illinois

Midwest networks, enterprise systems and financial applications

Downtown connectivity and western-suburb campus capacity solve different problems. A latency-sensitive financial workload needs a measured route to its counterparties. A larger suite needs a credible electrical delivery path. Chicago's market-wide inventory is not statewide capacity available for lease.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Chicago5780275 / 169

Before requesting a quote. Require a utility-backed date for new service and distinguish it from capacity already energized in a building. Price cross-connects, transport and support alongside space. When Chicago is selected for its network ecosystem, make the carrier and cloud connections part of the acceptance criteria.

Indianapolis and the New Carlisle development corridor

Indiana

Indiana enterprise colocation and longer-term campus evaluation

Indianapolis colocation and northern Indiana hyperscale development are different markets inside one state. Our guide keeps operating interconnected buildings apart from planned campuses. A large investment announcement says little about whether a smaller enterprise can lease a room there.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Indiana and New Carlisle1314312 / 24

Before requesting a quote. Ask who the tenant-facing operator is, what capacity is contractible and whether the required carriers are present. For a new campus, review the utility commitment and construction phase. Compare an operating Indianapolis facility with Chicago or Columbus before assuming a new development is the practical option.

Des Moines and Council Bluffs

Iowa

Regional enterprise capacity and Midwest secondary sites

Des Moines and Council Bluffs are separate city searches. Council Bluffs also belongs in an Omaha-area operational comparison across the Nebraska line. Hyperscaler-owned campuses in Iowa should not be treated as colocation inventory or evidence that a cloud on-ramp exists in an unrelated building.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Des Moines and Council Bluffs7547 / 14

Before requesting a quote. Confirm the exact cloud connection, its location and transport cost. Ask for the energy product and contractual evidence behind any renewable claim. Compare the selected city's network depth and remote-hands coverage with Omaha or Chicago, using the same deployment size and term.

Kansas-side facilities in the Kansas City region

Kansas

Central U.S. enterprise deployments

Kansas City is a two-state market. Our guide covers the region rather than assigning every building to Kansas. Use the street address to establish the jurisdiction, utility and local approvals before treating a regional operator list as a Kansas-specific list.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Kansas City22313Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Compare facilities on both sides of the state line and request separate utility and tax assumptions for each proposal. Confirm route diversity, on-site support and expansion in the quoted building. If central geography is the objective, test actual application latency against Dallas or Chicago.

Detroit and Southeast Michigan

Michigan

Michigan enterprise operations and regional recovery

A Detroit colocation search starts with operating enterprise buildings and their carrier connections. Statewide hyperscale or AI announcements are a separate supply story. The existence of a large proposed campus does not prove that the local building serving a manufacturing or business application has space.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Detroit and Southeast Michigan16130Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Request current room capacity, on-site support commitments and a documented growth path. Check the required paths to Chicago, local users and cloud endpoints. For newly powered developments, evaluate the utility commitment separately from the operator's construction announcement.

Minneapolis and Saint Paul

Minnesota

Upper Midwest enterprise systems and local operations

The Twin Cities are the starting point in our Minnesota guide. An enterprise requirement driven by staff access or regional users should compare local operating buildings first. A disaster-recovery requirement needs a second location selected for infrastructure independence as well as distance.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Minneapolis and Saint Paul25208Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Compare carrier diversity, cloud transport and support coverage at the building. Review cold-weather operating procedures and fuel logistics rather than inferring resilience from the climate. Price migration and recurring transport before deciding that an out-of-state facility is cheaper overall.

Kansas City, St. Louis and Springfield

Missouri

Central-region enterprise networks and Missouri operations

Kansas City's regional network ecosystem, St. Louis enterprise buildings and Springfield's smaller local footprint should be compared separately. Kansas City crosses into Kansas, so its guide is not a Missouri-only total. A smaller city may be appropriate for local users without matching the carrier choices of the larger metros.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Kansas City22313Not covered
St. Louis9103Not covered
Springfield, Missouri16Not covered

Before requesting a quote. List the carriers and cloud services that must be present, then check each building against that list. Ask whether growth remains in the same room and what support is available outside business hours. Compare the transport and staffing implications of the three cities before deciding on space cost.

Omaha and Sarpy County

Nebraska

Central U.S. enterprise capacity and Omaha-area operations

Omaha and Sarpy County are the Nebraska side of a metro search that can include Council Bluffs, Iowa. Our facility collection separates those sides by city. Keep that boundary when comparing counts, then cross it deliberately when comparing proposals for the same business requirement.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Omaha and Sarpy County8677 / 9

Before requesting a quote. Identify the utility at the exact site, the carrier routes and the confirmed expansion block. Review severe-weather procedures and backup fuel access. Compare Omaha with Council Bluffs using the same network endpoints and staffing assumptions instead of treating the state line as the workload boundary.

Columbus, Cleveland-Akron and Cincinnati-Dayton

Ohio

Ohio enterprise capacity and Midwest compute searches

Ohio is several utility and network markets, not one. Columbus, Northeast Ohio and Cincinnati-Dayton have separate guides and interconnection snapshots. A tariff or service rule quoted for one utility should not be applied to a building served by another, even when both addresses are in Ohio.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Columbus, Ohio1811217 / 47
Cleveland, Akron and Northeast Ohio2055Not covered
Cincinnati and Dayton1524Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Identify the utility, applicable service terms and required financial commitments for the selected site. Separate owner-occupied hyperscale campuses from tenant-facing colocation. Compare carrier presence and the growth path in operating rooms before using statewide investment totals to judge supply.

Milwaukee, Madison and separately evaluated campus projects

Wisconsin

Wisconsin enterprise operations and Midwest secondary capacity

Operating interconnected buildings in Milwaukee and Madison are a different supply layer from large owner-occupied campus investments. Our state guide keeps them apart. A hyperscaler's construction budget does not establish a colocation product a local business can buy.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Wisconsin1753Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Ask which operator sells the required cabinets or suite, whether the carriers are already present and what expansion is contractible. Compare the local support and migration case with Chicago. For new campuses, examine utility and construction commitments separately from public investment headlines.

South

Huntsville, Birmingham, Montgomery and Auburn

Alabama

Regional enterprise deployments and a Southeast second site

Auburn's interconnection building, Huntsville's enterprise demand and Birmingham's regional colocation serve different requirements. Treat them as separate city shortlists rather than a single statewide pool of space. The Alabama guide distinguishes regional colocation from the hyperscale campuses built for their owners.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Alabama631Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Ask which building can take the initial cabinets and the next expansion, which carriers are already inside it, and whether the quoted power cost includes demand charges. An operator's Southeast footprint is not a substitute for capacity in the Alabama building you select.

Miami and South Florida

Florida

South Florida users and international network dependencies

The South Florida guide is a Miami-region comparison, not a census of facilities in Tampa, Orlando or Jacksonville. Network requirements tied to Miami should be checked in the actual carrier building; a Florida address by itself does not establish access to the required route or exchange.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
South Florida30575Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Review flood exposure, storm access, generator fuel replenishment, equipment elevation and recovery procedures. Ask for the physical paths of primary and backup connections. If recovery is the objective, compare a second region as well as a second Florida building.

Atlanta and surrounding campus corridors

Georgia

Southeast enterprise networks and larger colocation searches

Atlanta's connected buildings and suburban campuses belong in different parts of a shortlist. Network-intensive workloads should start with carrier and cloud dependencies; larger suites should start with funded power and a delivery schedule. The state's average electricity price does not resolve either requirement.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Atlanta4058651 / 153

Before requesting a quote. Ask whether proposed capacity is energized, awaiting utility work or dependent on a future construction phase. Separate the initial power block from later expansion. Check route diversity and the full power pass-through before comparing an Atlanta proposal with Virginia or Texas.

Baltimore, Montgomery County and Frederick County

Maryland

Maryland users, local operations and Washington-region requirements

Baltimore's operating interconnection, Montgomery County's local enterprise buildings and Frederick's development proposals should not be grouped as interchangeable supply. Our Maryland guides keep these corridors separate. A large project near Washington does not establish leaseable capacity in the building your users can reach.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Baltimore and the Maryland corridor1342Not covered
Montgomery County, Maryland517Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Identify the required Washington-region network or cloud endpoints and measure the route from each candidate. For new projects, confirm local approval and power milestones. Test Northern Virginia alongside Maryland when network reach matters more than keeping the facility inside the state.

Charlotte, Raleigh-Durham and other covered Carolina cities

North Carolina

Southeast enterprise systems and regional users

Charlotte's network requirements and the buildings outside Charlotte are separate collections. The statewide guide provides the wider comparison; the Charlotte guide serves that metro. An announced campus in another county should not substitute for an operating building near the users or research systems driving the deployment.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Charlotte1653Not covered
North Carolina outside Charlotte1537Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Check the required carriers and cloud connections in the selected building. Ask which utility serves the address and what new-load milestones apply. Compare local approvals and power commitments at the site level when considering a new campus rather than a fitted operating room.

Oklahoma City, Tulsa and the wider state guide

Oklahoma

Regional enterprise systems and central compute evaluation

The Oklahoma guide separates operating interconnected buildings from larger development announcements. A power-led campus proposal and a regional enterprise colocation room answer different requirements. The first question is whether the named development will sell the product you need.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Oklahoma1153Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Request tenant-facing availability, carrier routes and the source of the power commitment. Review storm resilience, equipment protection and recovery procedures. If users are distributed nationally, measure Oklahoma against Dallas before making a decision from electricity cost alone.

Greenville, Columbia, Charleston and Myrtle Beach

South Carolina

Local enterprise workloads and coastal network requirements

South Carolina's cities are different products: Upstate enterprise needs, capital-region systems and coastal connections should not share one undifferentiated shortlist. Our state guide shows the registered network buildings and development context separately. A coastal network asset does not make every inland facility an equivalent connection point.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
South Carolina719Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Confirm required carriers in the building, local planning status and the utility-backed delivery date. Review coastal storm and flood exposure where relevant. If expansion is central to the requirement, ask whether it fits in the existing campus or requires a separately approved site.

Nashville and Memphis

Tennessee

Tennessee enterprise operations and regional secondary sites

Nashville and Memphis have separate guides and network collections. Power procurement needs the local utility as well as the wider supply context. A state electricity figure cannot describe the service agreement or expansion path offered by an individual operator.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Nashville942Not covered
Memphis415Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Identify the local power company, retail tariff and operator's recovery method. For a new project, confirm local zoning and the present approval path. Compare the carriers, support staffing and expansion block in the proposed building rather than relying on a statewide growth announcement.

Dallas-Fort Worth, Austin-San Antonio and Houston

Texas

Central enterprise networks, regional operations and larger suites

Dallas-Fort Worth, Central Texas and Houston should be separate market searches. Our guides compare their operating buildings, interconnection and reported development. A remote West Texas compute project is a further option with a different network and operating case, not interchangeable capacity in Dallas.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Dallas-Fort Worth5894999 / 288
Austin and San Antonio197330 / 107
Houston2117333 / 44

Before requesting a quote. Confirm the serving utility, grid connection, curtailment obligations and the date of the initial committed power block. Price transport and support for remote campuses. Distinguish operator-controlled energized capacity from a load application or a planned generation project.

Northern Virginia, Prince William, Richmond and Boydton

Virginia

East Coast interconnection and Virginia campus searches

Northern Virginia's network ecosystem, Prince William development, Richmond campuses and Boydton's owner-occupied development are different choices. Our guides retain those distinctions. A Virginia-wide ranking conceals the transport distance, utility constraints and tenant-facing products that determine whether a building suits a requirement.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Northern Virginia72956160 / 317
Prince William County838Not covered
Richmond63810 / 80

Before requesting a quote. Separate already energized capacity from a new utility connection. Check local entitlements, the actual carriers and the growth block under contract. If considering Richmond as an alternative to Ashburn, include transport to the network endpoints that made Northern Virginia attractive in the first place.

West

Phoenix, Mesa and the East Valley

Arizona

Western enterprise capacity and compute deployments

The Phoenix metro gives buyers a western alternative to coastal California. Mesa's newer campuses and established Phoenix buildings should be evaluated separately: a planned campus has a different delivery path from an operating room. Carrier choice and cooling capability still have to be confirmed at the building.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Phoenix and Mesa2527666 / 171

Before requesting a quote. Request the utility-backed power date, maximum sustained rack density, cooling design conditions and water requirements. Check how the facility operates through peak summer conditions. Do not infer a short utility queue from the state's electricity average or from a construction permit.

Silicon Valley and Los Angeles

California

Workloads that need California users, networks or operations

Silicon Valley and Los Angeles are distinct network markets. Northern California proximity can matter for Bay Area applications and staff; Los Angeles can matter for Southern California users and international network routes. A remote compute requirement and a network-heavy deployment need different comparisons.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Silicon Valley691,140115 / 144
Los Angeles4796145 / 57

Before requesting a quote. Measure application latency before paying for proximity. Compare carrier routes, cloud on-ramps, seismic design, utility service and migration costs. If users can tolerate another location, price Phoenix or Hillsboro alongside California while retaining the network presence the application needs.

Denver metro and Aurora

Colorado

Mountain-region enterprise systems and regional operations

Denver and Aurora are separate entries in our collections, but belong in one metro search for most buyers. An Aurora campus and a connected Denver building can have different strengths. Do not add their snapshot figures without first reconciling the building and geographic boundaries.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Denver24292Not covered
Aurora317Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Specify whether local staff access, carrier choice or larger power blocks drive the decision. Ask for diverse fiber routes, the actual utility service date and expansion within the selected campus. For disaster recovery, examine shared infrastructure and hazards rather than treating two metro addresses as independent.

Las Vegas and Reno

Nevada

Western deployments and alternatives to California

Las Vegas and Reno serve different users and transport paths. Reno belongs in a northern California comparison; Las Vegas belongs in a southwestern one. A statewide price or building count conceals the distance between them and does not describe latency to either coastal market.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Las Vegas and Reno12128Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Test latency from the specific campus, not from the city label. Ask about summer cooling performance, water supply, liquid-cooling support and the utility delivery date. Include transport back to California if applications or network exchanges remain there.

Hillsboro and Portland

Oregon

Pacific Northwest capacity and western enterprise systems

Hillsboro campus deployments and Portland network buildings need separate evaluation. Our guide covers that metro, not every data center in Oregon. A statewide electricity average is useful for screening, but the utility, tariff and network paths at the selected campus decide the actual operating case.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Hillsboro and Portland2420324 / 53

Before requesting a quote. Ask about sustained density, utility service, seismic design and diverse fiber routes. Confirm any required cloud on-ramp at its exact location. Compare Hillsboro with Seattle or northern California after including transport and migration costs, not just the space-and-power line.

Salt Lake City and the Wasatch Front

Utah

Mountain-region enterprise systems and western recovery

The Wasatch Front guide covers the operating network buildings relevant to a Salt Lake City search. A western recovery requirement should compare this market with other Mountain-region locations while checking the physical independence of power, fiber and operational support.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Salt Lake City and the Wasatch Front23203Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Test latency to the primary site and cloud endpoints. Review seismic design, water and cooling requirements, the serving utility and the contracted growth path. Ask for separate routes and support arrangements rather than assuming geographic distance alone delivers resilience.

Seattle-Puget Sound and Central Washington

Washington

Pacific Northwest networks or inland compute deployments

Seattle's connected buildings and Central Washington's campus market serve different workloads. Our separate guides show why they should not share one statewide capacity label. A compute deployment that can move inland has a different transport and operating case from an application needing Seattle users or exchanges.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Seattle and Puget Sound37532Not covered
Central Washington49Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Identify the actual utility and energy product at the inland site. Price transport to Seattle and required cloud endpoints. Review wildfire smoke exposure, seismic design and the physical diversity of fiber paths where applicable, using the facility's engineering and operating records.

Cheyenne and Laramie County

Wyoming

Power-led campus evaluation and regional enterprise requirements

The Cheyenne guide distinguishes registered network buildings from larger campus proposals. For a smaller enterprise deployment, the tenant-facing operator and required carriers matter before the scale of the development story. A proposed generation or campus figure does not establish delivered IT capacity.

Selected market snapshots; not a statewide census
Guide / collectionRegistered buildingsNetwork presencesOperating / total inventory buildings
Cheyenne and Laramie County37Not covered

Before requesting a quote. Require a contractible initial block, the exact delivery phase and network routes to users. Confirm on-site staffing and replacement-parts logistics. Compare Denver when support access or network depth matters, and test the operational case for the actual Wyoming address.

Profile basis: the linked market guides and their source records. PeeringDB is a participant-maintained directory, not an exhaustive census. Our inventory verifies buildings, not contractible space; see the verification method. State electricity data and metro snapshots have different scopes and should not be combined into a statewide capacity ranking.

From geography to a building

What to compare before you request proposals

1. Electricity price, power commitment and rent are different numbers

The state table gives an electricity screening benchmark in cents per kWh. Colocation quotes may instead charge for committed IT kW, a cabinet circuit, metered consumption or a combination. Keep those units separate. A lower electricity average does not establish a lower cabinet price, and it does not tell you when a utility can connect a new campus.

A utility-backed delivery date is also different from a developer's target opening date. Ask what work remains, who controls it and which milestone creates the contractual obligation to deliver. For an operating facility, ask how much of the energized capacity is already sold and whether your expansion block is reserved.

What one cent per kWh changes

For an illustrative constant 1 MW IT load, a PUE of 1.30 and a 30-day month, facility energy is 1,000 kW × 1.30 × 720 hours = 936,000 kWh. A 1¢/kWh difference changes that energy cost by $9,360 per month. This is an energy sensitivity example, not a colocation quote; utilization, actual PUE, tariff and the operator's billing method determine the result.

2. Normalize the whole quote

Cost or obligationCompare on the same basis
Space and committed powerUsable IT kW, cabinet or suite footprint, redundancy, minimum commitment, ramp schedule and the date billing begins.
Electricity recoveryMeter location, consumption rate, PUE multiplier if used, demand charges, fuel adjustments and the treatment of unused commitment.
ConnectivityCross-connect installation and recurring charges, carrier ports, cloud connection fees, diverse transport and any off-site exchange access.
OperationsIncluded remote hands, hourly minimums, after-hours work, receiving, storage, escort fees and support response commitments.
Entry and exitDeposits, installation, migration, removal, overlap between sites, notice periods and any early termination charges.
Growth and renewalReserved versus best-effort expansion, annual escalators, renewal terms, transfer rights and the price of the next capacity block.
Tax treatment and incentivesWhich costs appear on the tenant's invoice, who qualifies for any claimed benefit, what approval is required and what happens if a condition is missed.

Use the power billing guide to compare metered and committed models, the pricing benchmarks for sourced price context, and the RFP spreadsheet for a consistent operator response.

3. Test the network at the building

A directory listing shows a registered presence, not a promise that your preferred service is provisioned. Ask which carriers have lit equipment inside the building, whether the cloud connection is local or transported elsewhere, and where the primary and backup fiber paths run. Two providers using the same duct or meet-me room may share a failure point.

Measure latency to application endpoints, users and counterparties. Straight-line distance is a screening tool; the network route is what the application uses. Include the cost and latency of reaching an exchange in another metro when comparing a less connected campus with a carrier building.

4. Make cooling and density part of acceptance

Average campus density is not the allowable density of your rack row. Specify maximum sustained rack kW, the number of adjacent racks, the cooling interface and the temperature envelope. For liquid cooling, define who supplies and maintains the cooling distribution unit, coolant, connections, leak detection and heat rejection.

Ask which capacity has passed commissioning for that configuration and which still needs a retrofit. Put the ramp, acceptance test and responsibility for any enabling work into the proposal. See GPU and high-density colocation for the deployment checklist.

5. Evaluate a recovery site by independence

A second state does not automatically create an independent recovery site. Map the utilities, substations, long-haul fiber corridors, flood exposure and operating teams shared by the two facilities. Then test whether the resulting distance still meets replication, recovery-point and recovery-time requirements.

For coastal, seismic, wildfire, extreme-heat or severe-winter exposure, request the candidate facility's engineering basis and operating procedures. State labels are too broad to establish risk at a particular parcel. Support staffing, spare parts and access after an event belong in the same evaluation as the building.

6. Treat approvals as site-specific milestones

For a new facility or expansion, identify the jurisdiction and the work needed: land-use approval, building permits, utility service, environmental permits and commissioning. A state incentive announcement does not complete local approvals. A building permit does not complete a utility connection.

Ask the operator to state the remaining dependencies and provide a dated delivery commitment. For current space, request confirmation for the exact building, power block, density and term. Our quarterly permit reports show documented activity within their stated coverage; they are evidence of filings and government actions, not a statewide inventory or a lease offer.

How many data centers does each state have?

There is no comparable 50-state count in our collections. A building inventory, a registered network facility, a campus and a permit filing are different units. One campus may contain several buildings; one building may have many related permits; one operator may register more than one facility record. Counting them together creates a number without a consistent meaning.

This page therefore publishes selected metro snapshots with their boundaries and dates. A statewide count would require a separate, reconciled building census using the same inclusion rules in every state. States without a detailed guide are marked as a coverage gap, never as zero supply.

Is a hyperscale campus a colocation option?

Only if an operator actually sells the product you need there. A campus built for a cloud company or another single owner is not automatically tenant-facing inventory. Ask for the contracting operator, minimum commitment and available product before including it in a cabinet, cage or suite shortlist.

What is the best state for a data center?

For a colocation buyer, it is the state containing a building that meets the application's requirements at an acceptable total cost and date. For a new campus developer, the questions expand to land, entitlements, utility service and construction. An electricity ranking answers only one of those questions. Use the table to screen candidates, then compare two or three actual proposals.

National evidence: filings, buildings and announced projects
The national picture

What our national collections cover.

Three national collections supplement the market network snapshots above: permit and planning records, verified buildings and announced projects. They have different coverage and dates. Filing counts include related jobs and records across the collection history; they are not counts of new buildings or a quarterly capacity census. Announcements are not delivered capacity, and none of these tables measures space available for your requirement.

Our collection4319 filings trackedUpdated 22 October 2026
MarketFilings trackedLast 12 monthsLatest filingWhere it comes from
Northern Virginia76532120 October 2026Loudoun County LandMARC permit records, Virginia DEQ air permit records and Fairfax County PLUS planning records
Atlanta53430 June 2026Georgia EPD air permit search and Atlanta and Fulton County land disturbance records
Dallas-Fort Worth231366 October 2026TCEQ air permit search, City of Fort Worth permit records, City of Irving development permits and commercial permits, City of Dallas permit records, Plano, Allen and McKinney permit records and City of Denton permit records
Austin and San Antonio221830 June 2026. Latest permit issued: 24 July 2026City of San Antonio open permit data, TCEQ air permit search, City of Austin plan review cases and City of Austin issued construction permits
Phoenix and Mesa7691191 October 2026. Latest permit issued: 14 October 2026City of Phoenix plan review records, City of Mesa open permit data and Maricopa County Air Quality Department permit records
Columbus, Ohio30026 August 2025City of Columbus engineering records and EPA ECHO air facility records for Ohio
Des Moines and Council Bluffs9222 September 2026Iowa DNR EASY Air public inquiry
Indiana and New Carlisle100No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Indiana
Richmond27524 September 2026Virginia DEQ air permit records and Henrico County plan of development records
Kansas EPA air records40No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Kansas
New Mexico EPA air records20No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for New Mexico
New Hampshire EPA air records40No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for New Hampshire
South Dakota EPA air records10No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for South Dakota
Idaho EPA air records10No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Idaho
Connecticut EPA air records outside the tri-state counties10No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Connecticut outside the tri-state counties
Maine council records120No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 14 October 2026City of Bangor agendas
Louisiana council records30No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 18 May 2026City of Baton Rouge / East Baton Rouge Parish agendas
Pima County, Arizona board records649 September 2026. Latest permit issued: 22 September 2026Pima County Board of Supervisors matters
Upstate New York state environmental notices30No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 1 October 2025NYSDEC Environmental Notice Bulletin, upstate New York
Other Texas air permits11717 August 2026TCEQ air permit search
California EPA air records30No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for California
Kentucky EPA air records20No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Kentucky
Illinois EPA air records330No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Illinois
Houston201 June 2023TCEQ air permit search
Memphis150No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 30 July 2026City of Memphis DPD building permit records and EPA ECHO air facility records for Tennessee
Cheyenne and Laramie County70No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Wyoming
South Carolina30No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for South Carolina
Omaha and Sarpy County8768 September 2026Sarpy County building permits (City of Papillion Accela) and EPA ECHO air facility records for Nebraska
Nebraska outside the Omaha metro10No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Nebraska
Chicago217718 June 2026. Latest permit issued: 16 September 2026City of Chicago building permit records and Village of Elk Grove Village permit records
Central Washington570No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 22 July 2026Washington SEPA Register (Department of Ecology) and EPA ECHO air facility records for Washington
Boydton and Mecklenburg County2223 June 2026Virginia DEQ air permit records
Prince William County2482825 September 2026Prince William County data center project registry
Cleveland, Akron and Northeast Ohio30No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Ohio
Cincinnati and Dayton40No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Ohio
Ohio outside the named markets10No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Ohio
Boston262016 January 2013. Latest permit issued: 8 October 2026MassDEP air-quality permits, City of Boston approved building permits, EPA ECHO air facility records for Massachusetts and City of Somerville permits
Aurora194688 October 2026. Latest permit issued: 14 October 2026City of Aurora open permit records and Colorado APCD air permit documents
Denver metro outside Aurora78030 June 2025. Latest permit issued: 23 February 2026Colorado APCD air permit documents
Denver metro building permits outside Aurora24149 October 2026Denver ePermits public record search, City of Centennial permits and plans, Douglas County, Colorado permits and planning projects, City of Thornton building permits and development projects, Adams County, Colorado building permits and planning cases and City and County of Denver open permit and site plan records
Colorado outside the Denver metro4307 April 2025. Latest permit issued: 25 June 2026Colorado APCD air permit documents
New York tri-state air permits270No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 4 September 2026NJDEP air permit activities (NJEMS), EPA ECHO air facility records for New York and EPA ECHO air facility records for New Jersey
New Jersey construction permits at known data center parcels40No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 19 December 2025New Jersey DCA construction permit data
New York tri-state planning, legislation and state notices150No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 23 September 2026NYSDEC Environmental Notice Bulletin, Town of Orangetown planning and local law records, Town of Brookhaven board agendas, Town of Islip board documents, Town of Trumbull agendas and minutes and Town of Wallingford minutes and agendas
Silicon Valley430No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 19 October 2026City of San Jose building permits
Silicon Valley council and planning records50127 October 2026City of Santa Clara council and planning matters, City of San Jose council matters and City of Sunnyvale council matters
Newark council records223 September 2026. Latest permit issued: 9 September 2026Newark Municipal Council legislation
New York City871616 October 2026New York City DOB NOW filings at known data center buildings and New York City DOB NOW permit issuance
Minneapolis and St Paul200No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Minnesota
Detroit30No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Michigan
Michigan outside the Detroit metro20No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Michigan
Philadelphia160No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh80No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania outside Philadelphia and Pittsburgh80No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Pennsylvania
Nashville90No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Tennessee
Tennessee outside Nashville and Memphis10No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Tennessee
Wisconsin30No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Wisconsin
Mississippi20No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Mississippi
Montgomery County, Maryland35013 November 2024. Latest permit issued: 5 June 2025Montgomery County, Maryland commercial permits and EPA ECHO air facility records for Maryland
Frederick County, Maryland40No dates publishedFrederick County planning and permitting register and EPA ECHO air facility records for Maryland
Las Vegas7515 March 2026Clark County, Nevada building permits (Accela) and EPA ECHO air facility records for Nevada
Eastern Oregon10No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Oregon
Charlotte18522 June 2026City of Charlotte land development records (Accela)
Kansas City32029 April 2025. Latest permit issued: 1 May 2025City of Kansas City CompassKC permit records and EPA ECHO air facility records for Missouri
Missouri outside the Kansas City metro20No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Missouri
Salt Lake City and the Wasatch Front90No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 18 December 2025Utah Division of Air Quality approval orders
Utah outside the Wasatch Front100No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 11 September 2026Utah Division of Air Quality approval orders
Oklahoma130No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Oklahoma
Alabama40No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 30 April 2026EPA ECHO air facility records for Alabama and Huntsville air permit records
Maryland outside Montgomery and Frederick counties60No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Maryland
North Carolina outside Charlotte160No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for North Carolina
Hillsboro, Oregon planning cases44519 October 2026City of Hillsboro Accela planning records
Chesterfield County, Virginia planning cases80No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 10 June 2026Chesterfield County planning cases
Chandler, Arizona planning cases50No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 23 September 2009City of Chandler planning cases
Midlothian, Texas planning cases5113 July 2026City of Midlothian planning cases
Lancaster, Texas planning cases20No dates publishedCity of Lancaster zoning map districts
Irving, Texas planning cases419 December 2025City of Irving zoning applications
Richardson, Texas planning cases70No dates publishedCity of Richardson development projects
Mansfield, Texas development projects10No dates publishedCity of Mansfield development projects
Dallas CAD computer data centers (Irving + Garland)160No dates publishedDallas CAD computer data centers (Irving + Garland)
Spotsylvania County, Virginia planning cases12112 January 2026Spotsylvania County site-plan cases
Stafford County, Virginia planning cases100No dates publishedStafford County data center planning records
Caroline County, Virginia planning cases70No dates publishedCaroline County subdivisions and site plans
Hanover County, Virginia planning cases119 July 2026Hanover County eTRAKiT project records
Yorkville, Illinois planning cases30No dates publishedCity of Yorkville current projects and public hearings
DeKalb, Illinois planning cases20No dates publishedCity of DeKalb development projects
Aurora, Illinois final-plan decisions2020 June 2024. Latest permit issued: 16 July 2024City of Aurora, Illinois final-plan decisions
Cartersville, Georgia zoning decisions10No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 3 September 2026City of Cartersville zoning decisions
Beaver Dam, Wisconsin planning cases10No dates publishedCity of Beaver Dam meeting agendas
Cedar Rapids, Iowa planning cases3028 January 2025. Latest permit issued: 22 June 2026City of Cedar Rapids data center projects
El Mirage, Arizona development cases40No dates publishedCity of El Mirage Active Developments Map
Fort Wayne, Indiana site plan reviews524 May 2026Fort Wayne-Allen County Planning Services site plan reviews
Hobart, Indiana proposed site plans20No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 7 May 2026City of Hobart Plan Commission agendas
Hermantown, Minnesota special-use application10No dates publishedCity of Hermantown Special Use Permit application
Statesville, North Carolina planning cases10No dates publishedCity of Statesville Planning Board agendas
The Dalles, Oregon site-plan decisions30No dates publishedCity of The Dalles site-plan review records
Botetourt County, Virginia grading permit10No dates publishedBotetourt County land-disturbance permit announcement
Southaven, Mississippi design review10No dates publishedCity of Southaven design-review agenda
Gallatin, Tennessee council agenda items40No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 6 October 2026City of Gallatin council agenda
Dorchester County, South Carolina land-development reviews10No dates publishedDorchester County active land-development projects
Casa Grande, Arizona conditional-use review10No dates publishedCity of Casa Grande Planning and Zoning Commission records
Menomonie, Wisconsin rezoning decision10No filing dates published. Latest permit issued: 4 August 2025City of Menomonie council rezoning minutes
Archbald, Pennsylvania conditional-use applications2226 January 2026Archbald Borough conditional-use applications
West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana planning requests20No dates publishedWest Feliciana Parish planning hearing notices
Atlanta-area building permits593419 October 2026City of Atlanta Accela permit records and Gwinnett County Accela permit records
Atlanta-area planning and agenda items1106820 October 2026Atlanta-area council and commission agendas (CivicClerk), City of Fayetteville council agendas and minutes and Rockdale County Board of Commissioners hearing packets
Atlanta regional development reviews1203 October 2025Atlanta Regional Commission development of regional impact reviews
Orlando10No dates publishedEPA ECHO air facility records for Florida

Every capacity figure in the record

35 filings out of 4,319 state a capacity. That ratio is the point: megawatts are the field public records almost never carry, so a permit that names one is worth reading closely. The basis matters as much as the number. A figure the applicant stated for the project is a claim about the build. A generator nameplate is backup plant, and treating it as sellable load is the most common way these records get misquoted.

CapacityMarketBasisThe filing
360 MWCentral WashingtonCapacity stated in the filingEAT12-13-14 Data Center Campus Microsoft
308 MWPhoenix and MesaGenerator nameplate, summed from stated ratingsNTT Global Data Centers Americas is adding an additional Data Center building in Mesa, Arizona as part of a 244 MW master planned...
196 MWDallas-Fort WorthCapacity stated in the filingEdged Energy Outpost Building 2
196 MWDallas-Fort WorthCapacity stated in the filingEdged Energy Outpost Building 2
96 MWNorthern VirginiaCapacity stated in the filingNew build 2-story 96 MW data center on existing campus for CloudHQ. Will include ma
80 MWPhoenix and MesaCapacity stated in the filing...* * * *Dynalectric - East Mesa 80 MW Data Center* * * * * *
60 MWAuroraCapacity stated in the filingQts Den1 Dc2, 60 MW Tenant Fit Out Revision
36 MWNorthern VirginiaCapacity stated in the filing...Tenant Improvements Include The Interior Fit Out Of Three Existing 36 MW Data Halls And Office Spaces With An Approximate Tota...
22.5 MWAuroraCapacity stated in the filingQTS DEN1 DC1, 22.5 MW TFO
14 MWNorthern VirginiaCapacity stated in the filingData Hall fitout of 14 MW across 2 floors.
14 MWNorthern VirginiaCapacity stated in the filingData Hall fitout of 14 MW across 2 floors.
14 MWNorthern VirginiaCapacity stated in the filing...Hall build out for three 14 MW's (92,748 sq. ft. total), which contains busway and hot ais
12 MWNorthern VirginiaCapacity stated in the filingData Hall build out for two 12 MW's, which contains busway and hot aisle containment. Phase 3
12 MWPhoenix and MesaCapacity stated in the filing...type I-B construction, 40,964 SF. Scope includes fit out of 12 MW data hall space with racks and associated electrical, Defer
12 MWCharlotteCapacity stated in the filingCLT 16 12 MW Data Center
12 MWCharlotteCapacity stated in the filingCLT 15 12 MW Data Center
10 MWKansas EPA air recordsCapacity stated in the filingClop Olathe - 10 MW Data Center (Air)
9 MWAustin and San AntonioCapacity stated in the filingSpc Qts Sat2 - Dc1 9 MW Fitout
8 MWPhoenix and MesaCapacity stated in the filing...Tenant improvement include technology and electrical fitout of (3) 8 MW data halls and tenant office and storage spaces. Speci...
6 MWPhoenix and MesaCapacity stated in the filing...B, S-1 and S-2 occupancy. Modification scope includes fit out of 6 MW data hall space with racks and associated electrical. Sp...
6 MWBostonGenerator nameplate, summed from stated ratingsCoresite B01 - Upgrades to existing medium voltage gear, install of (2) new 3000KW generators & (2) 3000KW Megapod Modular Uninte...
6 MWAuroraCapacity stated in the filingQts Den1 Dc1 6 MW White Box With Some Exterior Work - Data Hall Remodel
5.7 MWCentral WashingtonGenerator nameplate, summed from stated ratingsSEPA determination: MDNS
5 MWOther Texas air permitsCapacity stated in the filingEl Paso 5 MW Data Center
5 MWOmaha and Sarpy CountyCapacity stated in the filingOPPIDAN - 5 MW Papillion Data Center
5 MWOmaha and Sarpy CountyCapacity stated in the filingGrading - Oppidan - Papillion 5 MW Data Center
5 MWMinneapolis and St PaulCapacity stated in the filingEagan 5 MW Data Center
4 MWDallas CAD computer data centers (Irving + Garland)Capacity stated in the filingDfw1 (Irving) - 4 MW
3.7 MWCentral WashingtonGenerator nameplate, summed from stated ratingsIntegrate Columbia II
3.25 MWMemphisCapacity stated in the filingInstall data centers. This will include a new service that will power 20 transformers (3,250kva) that supplies power to twenty se...
2.5 MWMemphisCapacity stated in the filing...phase 1: Initial deployment of 2.5 MW, the plans below describe the site and layout. You will see
2.25 MWAustin and San AntonioCapacity stated in the filingInterior remodel to existing Data Center to replacement of six 2250 KVA UPS System including batteries.
2.25 MWAustin and San AntonioCapacity stated in the filingInterior remodel to existing Data Center, to replacement of six 2250 KVA UPS System , including batteries.
2 MWBostonCapacity stated in the filing...- Install Data center work includes, electrical and addition of a 2 MW generator to roof,fp and alrm
1 MWBostonCapacity stated in the filingReplacement of a 500kW UPS with a new 500kW UPS at Boston College's data center

What the filings are for

Type of workFilingsWhat it tells a buyer
Power and cooling1578Generators, substations and switchgear. Power is being solved, which is where dates slip
Type not stated1469The record proves the filing exists and names the site, and says nothing about the work
Tenant fit-out897A customer is being installed in a specific hall. The clearest sign a building is filling up
New building234Shell, foundation and site work. Capacity 12 to 24 months out, not capacity now
Expansion or phase141An existing campus is adding to itself, which is usually the fastest space to reach
Our collection1,774 facilities16 markets
MarketFacilitiesOperationalUnder constructionPlanned
Northern Virginia31716035122
Dallas-Fort Worth2889928161
Phoenix and Mesa171662183
Chicago169751381
Atlanta153511488
Silicon Valley144115821
Austin and San Antonio107301463
New York Tri-State978917
Richmond80101059
Los Angeles5745210
Hillsboro and Portland5324821
Columbus, Ohio47171317
Houston443329
Indiana and New Carlisle2412012
Des Moines and Council Bluffs14716
Omaha and Sarpy County9702
All markets we cover1,774840170762

From our verified inventory rather than from a public record, so these rows carry no filing link and street addresses are held back. The building is what is verified, not the availability of space inside it: a planned facility is an intention rather than a delivery date, and an operational one may be entirely full. See what a verified building does and does not mean.

Announced, not filed76 projectsUpdated 3 October 2026
CapacityOperatorMarketProject
3.7 GWHomer City RedevelopmentPittsburghHomer City Energy Campus
2.4 GWTPG Real Estate and CatellusFrederick County, MarylandQuantum Frederick, the former Alcoa Eastalco Works site, Adamstown
2 GWTractAustin and San AntonioCaldwell County park
2 GWxAIMemphisColossus, the Memphis campus
1.8 GWPowerHouse Data Centers and ProvidentDallas-Fort WorthDFW campus
1.8 GWGoogle, with TallgrassCheyenne and Laramie CountyProject Tembo, formerly Project Jade
1.4 GWOpenAI, Oracle and Related DigitalDetroit and Southeast MichiganStargate, Saline Township
1.3 GWVantage Data CentersWisconsinPort Washington campus, Ozaukee County
1.2 GWCloudBurstAustin and San AntonioSan Marcos campus
1 GWECLHoustonTerraSite-TX1
1 GWNot disclosedDetroit and Southeast MichiganVan Buren Township proposal
1 GWEagle Rock PartnersSouth CarolinaGreen Pond campus, Colleton County
1 GWGoogle, with Tenaska and TallgrassOmaha and Sarpy CountyThe proposed Nebraska mega-campus (Project Tenaska)
900 MWUndisclosed developerRichmondUpper Magnolia Green, Chesterfield County
900 MWMicrosoftWisconsinMount Pleasant, the former Foxconn site in Racine County
650 MWSwitchLas Vegas and RenoCitadel campus, Tahoe Reno
600 MWSkybox Datacenters and PrologisAustin and San AntonioPowerCampus Austin, Hutto
550 MWYondrDallas-Fort WorthLancaster campus
400 MWDigital RealtyCharlotteMoores Chapel campus
360 MWPacific ProvingPhoenix and MesaPacific Proving Technology Park, Mesa
360 MWAtmosphere Data CentersMontgomery County, MarylandDickerson Generating Station, northern Montgomery County
336 MWNTT Global Data CentersPrince William CountyGainesville campus
324 MWMicrosoftAtlantaUnion City campus
311 MWBig Digital EnergyDallas-Fort WorthCampus outside DFW
300 MWCorscale Data CentersPrince William CountyGainesville Crossing
300 MWRowan DigitalAustin and San AntonioCinco campus, Medina County
250 MWPrologisCincinnati and DaytonProject Mila, Trenton Industrial Park, Butler County
249 MWEquinix and PrologisSeattle and Puget SoundThree proposed data centers
240 MWNTT Global Data CentersPhoenix and MesaMesa campus
231 MWRowan Digital InfrastructureFrederick County, MarylandBauxite campus, Quantum Frederick
220 MWSTACK InfrastructureDallas-Fort WorthDallas campus
200 MWIron MountainRichmondWhite Oak Technology Park, Henrico County
200 MWNovva Data CentersSalt Lake City and the Wasatch FrontWest Jordan flagship campus
200 MWQTS Data CentersSalt Lake City and the Wasatch FrontEagle Mountain gas plant
192 MWVantage Data CentersColumbus, OhioOH1, New Albany
180 MWAllegheny DC Property Co.PittsburghSpringdale, the former Cheswick site
160 MWQTS Data CentersAuroraAurora-Denver campus
150 MWLakeland Equity GroupCleveland, Akron and Northeast Ohio3560 East 55th Street, Slavic Village
150 MWSecurity Land and Development LPBaltimore and the Maryland corridorProposed campus at 1500 Woodlawn Drive
144 MWSTACK InfrastructureNorthern VirginiaLoudoun County Campus
130 MWSwitchLas Vegas and RenoTahoe Reno 1
120 MWTerraWatt, with Contour and Steadfast CitySt. LouisArmory Innovation District, the former Famous-Barr warehouse at 3728 Market Street
114 MWEdgeCore Digital InfrastructureNorthern VirginiaAshburn campus, on Maries Road and Moran Road in Sterling
108 MWGrindcapAtlantaBells Ferry Road, Marietta
108 MWAligned Data CentersHillsboro and PortlandPDX-01 and PDX-02, Hillsboro
100 MWAligned Data CentersChicagoORD1, Northlake
100 MWCore Scientific and CoreWeaveOklahomaMSK1, Port of Muskogee
100 MWTierPointLehigh Valley, Reading and Camp HillTekPark power expansion, Breinigsville
97 MWGoodmanSilicon ValleyWest Trimble Road, San Jose
72 MWAligned Data CentersFrederick County, MarylandIAD-06, Quantum Frederick
68 MWSabey Data CentersSeattle and Puget SoundTukwila campus expansion
60 MWCoreSiteDenverDenver campus expansion at 4900 Race Street
50 MWMarkley GroupBoston and New EnglandLowell data center
50 MWDC BLOXNashvilleNashville campus, Grassmere Park
48 MWStream Data CentersDallas-Fort WorthWilmer II
48 MWMicrosoftBoydton and Mecklenburg CountyHillcrest campus, 210 Tunstall Road, north of South Hill
40 MWWhiteFiberNorth Carolina outside CharlotteNC-1, Madison, Rockingham County
36 MWSTACK InfrastructureChicagoCHI02, Elk Grove Village
32 MWGoodman GroupLos AngelesLAX01, Vernon
32 MWDigital RealtyLos AngelesPacific Boulevard, Vernon
30 MWMarkley GroupBoston and New EnglandOne Summer Street
26 MWEdged EnergyKansas CityEdged Kansas City
26 MWNot disclosedDetroit and Southeast MichiganAllen Park proposal
22.5 MWFlexentialDenverParker data center, Compark Business Campus
20 MW5C Data CentersPhoenix and MesaPhoenix facility
17 MWViVaVerse SolutionsHoustonViVa Center microgrid
16 MWIron MountainSouth FloridaMIA-1
15 MW5CMemphisMEM01, the former Fred's headquarters on Getwell Road
12 MWRadiusDCNashvilleNashville I
10 MWElement CriticalHoustonHouston One expansion
10 MWCerebras and Scale DatacentersOklahomaOklahoma City, an 82,000 sq ft conversion
9.2 MWRadiusDCSouth FloridaMiami I expansion
6 MWSabey Data CentersSeattle and Puget SoundSDC Seattle
5 MW1623 FarnamOmaha and Sarpy CountySecond Omaha interconnection facility
5 MWDC BLOXAlabamaMontgomery, Interstate Industrial Park at Hope Hull
5 MWDC BLOXAlabamaHuntsville, a second site alongside the existing HSV1

Our announced-capacity collection has no sourced megawatt figure for New York Tri-State, Des Moines and Council Bluffs, Indiana and New Carlisle, Philadelphia, Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Central Washington. That is a coverage limit, not evidence of no development. See the individual market guides for the projects and source limitations.

One requirement, several markets

Request proposals on the same basis.

Send the IT power, rack density, network requirements, target date and preferred regions. A scout can compare buildings against that requirement and separate confirmed capacity from future phases.