How much does colocation cost in Des Moines?
Recent quotes we received for Central Time Region / Midwest ran $245 to $295 per kW per month for up to 500 kW, falling to $160 to $190 above 1 MW.
| Deployment | Monthly rate | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Up to 500 kW | $245 to $295/kW-mo | Our quotes |
| Over 500 kW to 1 MW | $200 to $240/kW-mo | Our quotes |
| Over 1 MW | $160 to $190/kW-mo | Our quotes |
No research house publishes a Des Moines or Iowa asking-rate band, so the Central Region quotes are the figure to plan with.
Smaller deployments cost more per kW. These are recent quotes we received, not a statement that space is available. Cross-connects, remote hands and one-time setup are extra. Operators often give 2–3 free months on a new term. See every region's quote ranges.
Des Moines cabinet and cage prices
Smaller deployments are priced per cabinet or per cage rather than per kW. Use these monthly ranges to set a first-pass budget. They are not provider offers, and a building on this page is not a claim that space is available in it.
| Requirement | Monthly range | Power and bandwidth assumed |
|---|---|---|
| 1 to 2U | $280 to $450/mo | 1 to 3 A at 120 V, 1 to 5 TB of transfer |
| Half cabinet, 24U | $1,120 to $1,345/mo | 2 to 3 kW, 100 Mbps to 1 Gbps |
| Full cabinet, 48U | $1,330 to $1,765/mo | 2 to 5 kW, 100 Mbps to 1 Gbps |
| High-density cabinet, 48U | $2,290 to $4,740/mo | 10 to 17 kW, three-phase |
| Private cage, 4 racks | $5,405 to $5,735/mo | 5 kW per rack, 1 Gbps |
| High-density private cage, 4 racks | $16,370 to $20,335/mo | 20 kW per rack, 1 Gbps |
Based on quotes we received in the 30 days before 27 October 2026. Taxes, cross-connects, remote hands and one-time costs are extra. Replace these ranges with a normalized written quote before approval. How power is billed is covered in how colocation power is billed.
Iowa's cost advantages are real at scale and thinner at the small end, because a small deployment is competing for space in a market with few multi-tenant operators. Do not assume a cabinet here prices like the megawatts do. It frequently does not, and the reason is competition rather than cost.
What the total monthly Des Moines cost includes
Cabinet and power
Normalize allocated power, usable IT load, metering and overage language. Ask whether the renewable attribution is contractual or marketing.
Cooling and free-cooling seasonality
The climate reduces mechanical load for much of the year. Ask whether that shows up in your bill or only in the operator's margin.
Cross-connects and cloud on-ramps
The line item that usually justifies the whole deployment. Price it per port per month, per region, and model it against the WAN circuit it replaces.
Remote hands and travel
Model this higher than in a metro market. Staff visits are longer and more expensive, so the remote hands rate and response SLA carry more weight.
How long Des Moines space takes to deliver
Most Iowa capacity belongs to a small number of hyperscale owners and will never be offered to an enterprise buyer. The available market is a handful of multi-tenant operators, so a search here converges quickly.
| Option | Footprint | Usable power | Cooling support | Estimated delivery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cabinet search | 1 to 4 cabinets | 5 to 80 kW | Air or containment; liquid by review | Target 30 to 90 days |
| Cage search | 4 to 20 cabinets | 20 to 250 kW | Density-specific engineering review | Target 60 to 180 days |
| Suite search | 250 kW to 1 MW | Contracted usable kW to be defined | Air, RDHx or liquid-ready by facility | Target 6 to 24 months |
Get Des Moines colocation prices for your setup
Tell us the racks, power and timing you need. A scout comes back with matching Des Moines and Council Bluffs options and quoted prices.
What providers in Des Moines post as a list price
Most colocation in Des Moines is quoted, not posted. The provider below is the exception: it publishes a monthly price on its own website, and every row links to that page. It is a smaller regional operator. The large operators here do not publish prices at all, so read these as a floor and a sanity check, not as what an enterprise contract lands at.
| Monthly | Provider | Offer | Power included | Per usable kW | Bandwidth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $875 | InfoBunker | Full rack. West Des Moines. $750 each from the third rack | 20A at 120V (1.92 kW usable) | $456 | 10 Mbps |
Each price was read on the provider's own page on the date shown. Usable kW is 80% of the circuit rating, with a redundant A+B pair counted once, and is only worked out where the provider states both amps and volts. "From" is the provider's own word for a starting price. Providers whose networks carry spam or abuse flags are left out whatever their price. A posted price is not availability, and bundles differ in bandwidth and power, so compare the whole row rather than the first column. How power is billed is covered in how colocation power is billed.
Send it over and a scout will tell you how it compares with these posted prices and with the published benchmarks for this market. There is no obligation.
Who is actually plugged in across Des Moines and Council Bluffs
A building existing and a building being connected are different facts, and only one of them decides whether your traffic can get where it needs to go cheaply. These figures come from PeeringDB, which the network operators themselves maintain, so every row below links to the building's own public entry.
| Measure | Figure | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Buildings listed | 7 | Registered in PeeringDB across Des Moines and Council Bluffs, by 6 operators |
| Buildings with a network present | 7 | Every listed building has at least one network in it |
| Network presences | 54 | Counted per building, so a carrier in three buildings counts three times |
| Internet exchange presences | 4 | Where you can reach many networks through one port instead of many cross-connects |
| Carrier presences | 7 | The physical transport choice you can buy without leaving the building |
| In the densest building | 37% | SFN IA-Davenport holds 20 of the market's network presences |
The most connected buildings here
| Networks | Building | Operator | Exchanges | Carriers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | SFN IA-Davenport | South Front Networks | 1 | 3 |
| 10 | Connect Des Moines | Connect Des Moines, LLC | 0 | 1 |
| 8 | Cologix DSM1 | Cologix, Inc. | 2 | 2 |
| 7 | LightEdge Des Moines 1 (DSM1) | LightEdge Solutions | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | LightEdge Des Moines 2 (DSM2) | LightEdge Solutions | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | Aureon Downtown | Aureon Network Services | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | IP Pathways DSM1 | IP Pathways, LLC | 0 | 0 |
From PeeringDB, which is maintained by the network operators present in these buildings rather than by the landlords, which is what makes it worth more than a directory. Two limits. Entries are voluntary, so a building showing no networks may be single tenant or may simply never have registered. And a network being present says nothing about whether the building has space, power or a price for you: that is still a call.
Emerging market profileWhy Iowa exists as a data center market
Iowa was chosen by the hyperscalers for a short list of reasons that still hold. Power is cheap and heavily wind-generated, which matters to buyers with renewable commitments. Land is inexpensive and available in very large contiguous parcels. The climate supports long stretches of free cooling. Natural disaster exposure is low by U.S. standards. And the state's data center tax treatment has been favorable for well over a decade.
Those advantages were captured almost entirely by three companies. What that leaves for an enterprise buyer is a genuine but narrow multi-tenant market, plus the ability to sit adjacent to a major cloud region without paying coastal prices for the privilege.
Most Iowa colocation requirements are not looking for cheap megawatts in the abstract. They are looking to be a short cross-connect from a cloud region their application already uses. That is a network question before it is a real estate question, and it narrows the shortlist quickly.
What we are tracking in Iowa right now
Iowa publishes air permits through the Department of Natural Resources, and for data centers those are unusually informative. A campus of this size needs backup generation, backup generation needs an air permit, and the permit record therefore tracks construction in a way local building departments in these counties do not.
What has been announced in Des Moines and Council Bluffs
Iowa's campuses are hyperscale self-builds, and Google, Microsoft and Meta publish dollars and square feet rather than megawatts. Google has committed a further $7bn across Iowa and Meta's Altoona campus passes 5 million SF, but no megawatt figure has been announced for either. That absence is the market: what is being built here is not for lease. Read the reporting.
Announced capacity is collected by hand from trade reporting and company statements, and each figure links to the report it came from. It is kept apart from the permit record below and never added to it: one is a document a jurisdiction issued, the other is a plan a company published. Neither is availability.
Every Des Moines and Council Bluffs facility we track
14 data centers across Des Moines and Council Bluffs, from our verified inventory. It is the layer that says whether a building exists yet, which no permit record answers directly.
| Status | Facilities | What it means for a search |
|---|---|---|
| Operational | 7 | Standing and running. The only layer that can hold a requirement this year |
| Under construction | 1 | Steel is up. Reachable for a date 6 to 18 months out, and usually pre-leasing now |
| Planned | 6 | Announced or entitled, not yet built. Treat every date on these as a forecast |
| Building area on file | 995,074 SF | Across the 8 facilities where a size is recorded, of 14 |
| Largest single building | 285,444 SF | Edged Energy, Council Bluffs |
Operators with the most facilities here: Cologix (3), Edged Energy (3), LightEdge (2), Tract (2), Connect Data Centers (1), CyrusOne (1), GIGA Energy (1), US Signal (1).
Where they cluster: Altoona (4), Council Bluffs (3), Des Moines (2), Ankeny (1), Cedar Falls (1), Manning (1).
The largest buildings coming to this market
7 facilities here are under construction or planned. These are the ten largest by floor area, and a size on file is not a promise of a delivery date.
| Operator | Status | Building size | Where |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edged Energy | Planned | 285,444 SF | Council Bluffs, IA |
| Edged Energy | Planned | 285,444 SF | Council Bluffs, IA |
| Cologix | Planned | Not on file | Altoona, IA |
| Edged Energy | Under Construction | Not on file | Ankeny, IA |
| GIGA Energy | Planned | Not on file | Manning, IA |
| Tract | Planned | Not on file | Norwalk, IA |
| Tract | Planned | Not on file | Altoona, IA |
From our verified inventory rather than from a public record, so these rows carry no filing link and street addresses are held back. These buildings are verified, which is not the same as their space being available: every facility above may be full, pre-leased, or closed to your size. Finding out is a call, not a lookup. See what a verified building does and does not mean.
Iowa DNR air permits across the Des Moines and Council Bluffs corridors. Every figure below is a count of filings we collected ourselves, and every row links to the record it came from.
| Measure | Figure | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Filings we track | 9 | Deduplicated. One source, September 2023 to September 2026 |
| Filed in the last 12 months | 2 | The live rate of construction activity, which is the number that moves |
| Distinct addresses | 5 | Separate sites in the record, not separate buildings |
| Operators we can name | 2 | 3 of 9 filings name a recognizable operator. The rest name an engineer, a builder or a holding company |
| Filings with no date published | 6 | The source publishes the facility, not the filing date |
Operators appearing by name: Amazon Web Services (2), CyrusOne (1).
The filings on the record
| Filed | Named on the filing | What it says | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 September 2026 | Not an identifiable operator | Osmium Data Center | Power and cooling |
| 29 July 2026 | Not an identifiable operator | Ginger West Data Center - 11100 Booneville Rd | Power and cooling |
| 20 September 2023 | Not an identifiable operator | Willow Creek / Ginger East Data Centers | Power and cooling |
| No date published | Not an identifiable operator | Ginger West Data Center - 11100 Booneville Rd | Power and cooling |
| No date published | Not an identifiable operator | Osmium Data Center | Power and cooling |
| No date published | Amazon Web Services | Amazon.com Services LLC - SNE1 | Power and cooling |
| No date published | Amazon Web Services | Amazon.com Services LLC - MLI1 | Power and cooling |
| No date published | CyrusOne | CyrusOne LLC | Power and cooling |
Collected from Iowa DNR EASY Air public inquiry. A permit or air-register entry documents a site or proposed work. It does not establish current construction or available space, and no public filing anywhere discloses what is contractible at a named building. That answer comes from an operator call, which is the part we do by hand. See how we verify capacity.
The code names, and how to read them
The single most useful thing in the Iowa record is that hyperscalers do not file under their own names. They file under project entities, and once you know the pattern you can read the pipeline months ahead of any announcement.
Ginger West
West Des Moines, Dallas County, at 11100 Booneville Road. Title V permit 26-TV-003, with 126 air permit records in one project group and a fresh construction application received in July 2026.
Osmium
West Des Moines, Warren County. Title V permit 24-TV-004, with 104 air permit records. A second campus of comparable scale to Ginger West.
Willow Creek and Ginger East
Polk County. A Title V pre-application entering technical review in 2023, which is the earliest stage the record captures.
Named filers
CyrusOne and Amazon file under their own names in Council Bluffs and Davenport. CyrusOne holds three permit groups at one Pottawattamie County facility.
A project name that appears with a Title V permit and a hundred-plus emissions unit records is a campus, not a building. A pre-application in technical review is two to four years from serving anyone. Those two states look similar in a news story and are completely different in a buying decision.
The most recent record in our Iowa set is a construction application for the Ginger West site, received 29 July 2026 against an expected 2028 window. New construction filings on an existing Title V campus mean expansion, and expansion means the operator is committing capital against demand it can already see. That is a reason to ask what is coming, not just what exists.
The two corridors, and what each is for
West Des Moines and Dallas County
The larger and more active corridor. Multiple Title V campuses under continuous expansion, with the newest construction filings in the state.
Council Bluffs and Pottawattamie County
The older corridor, anchored by long-established campuses. CyrusOne is the one operator here with a genuine multi-tenant proposition.
Des Moines proper
Where the enterprise colocation and carrier presence sits. Smaller footprints, better network choice, and the realistic answer for most requirements under a megawatt.
Davenport and the Quad Cities
A separate eastern cluster on the Illinois border. Thinner, but relevant if Chicago latency matters more than Omaha latency.
When Iowa is the right answer
- Cloud adjacency: if your application lives in a cloud region hosted here, a cross-connect beats a WAN circuit on both latency and cost.
- Renewable commitments: Iowa's generation mix makes a genuine renewable claim easier to document than in most markets.
- Disaster recovery distance: a low-risk geography that is genuinely uncorrelated with coastal primaries.
- Cost pressure at scale: power and land economics that hold up against any market in the country.
- Free cooling: a climate that reduces mechanical load for a large part of the year.
It is the wrong answer when you need carrier and cloud on-ramp breadth, when staff need to reach the site regularly from a coastal office, or when the requirement is large and near-term. The multi-tenant layer in Iowa is small enough that a handful of conversations exhausts it.
What to ask an Iowa operator
- Which cloud regions are reachable on net today, and at what cross-connect cost?
- Is the power for my hall energized, or does it depend on the same expansion the campus next door is queued for?
- What is the renewable attribution, and can it be documented for reporting?
- What is the winter and summer PUE profile, and how is that reflected in my power bill?
- What is the realistic staffing and remote hands model given the drive time from a major airport?
- Does the state tax treatment apply at my investment size, and who confirms that?
The tax question is worth handling carefully. Iowa's data center incentives have thresholds, and a colocation tenant's position is different from an owner's. Confirm it with a tax advisor rather than a landlord, and model the case without it.
What we cannot tell you from public records
Air permits are a strong construction signal and a poor capacity signal. Nothing in the Iowa record discloses IT load, leasable space, or availability, and the project entities that dominate the record are deliberately opaque about ownership. Several rows carry no filing date at all, because the state publishes the permit without one.
What the record gives you is which sites are live, which are expanding, and when the most recent filing landed. Everything past that comes from an operator call. That limit is the same in every market, and Iowa is simply more honest about it than most. See how we verify capacity.