Why Philadelphia is a market at all
Philadelphia is an interconnection and enterprise market, and it has never pretended to be anything else. It is the fifth largest US metro by population, it sits between two of the largest data center markets in the world, and it has almost no wholesale capacity of its own. The buildings that matter here are downtown carrier hotels and regional colocation sites serving Philadelphia businesses, universities and hospitals, not campuses serving hyperscalers.
That is not a failure of the market so much as a consequence of geography. Northern Virginia is two hundred miles south and New Jersey's Hudson waterfront is ninety miles north. A requirement large enough to be worth a campus has always been able to reach one of those instead, and the fibre between them is excellent. What stays here stays because the people using it are here.
The interconnection that does exist is heavily concentrated. One building on North Broad Street carries more than four in every ten network presences in the metro. If that building suits you this is a straightforward market. If it does not, the choices narrow fast.
There is no announced capacity table on this page, because no operator has published a capacity figure for a project inside this city. That absence is the finding, not a gap in our research. Every figure that does appear is either a building a network registered itself into, or a number a company published elsewhere and we have said where.
Who is actually plugged in across Philadelphia
A building existing and a building being connected are different facts, and only one of them decides whether your traffic can get where it needs to go cheaply. These figures come from PeeringDB, which the network operators themselves maintain, so every row below links to the building's own public entry.
| Measure | Figure | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Buildings listed | 18 | Registered in PeeringDB across Philadelphia, by 14 operators |
| Buildings with a network present | 13 | 5 carry no network presence, which usually means single tenant or simply unregistered |
| Network presences | 117 | Counted per building, so a carrier in three buildings counts three times |
| Internet exchange presences | 5 | Where you can reach many networks through one port instead of many cross-connects |
| Carrier presences | 7 | The physical transport choice you can buy without leaving the building |
| In the densest building | 42% | Netrality Philadelphia - 401 N Broad holds 49 of the market's network presences |
The most connected buildings here
| Networks | Building | Operator | Exchanges | Carriers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49 | Netrality Philadelphia - 401 N Broad | Netrality Data Centers | 3 | 2 |
| 23 | Equinix PH1 - Philadelphia | Equinix, Inc. | 1 | 0 |
| 11 | Crown Castle Philadelphia (401 N Broad) | Crown Castle Inc. | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 365 Data Centers Philadelphia (PH2) | 365 Data Centers | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | TierPoint Valley Forge | TierPoint, LLC | 0 | 1 |
| 5 | DataBank Philadelphia (PHL1) | DataBank, Ltd. | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | H5 Data Centers Philadelphia (PA01) | H5 Data Centers | 0 | 1 |
| 5 | Quonix Datacenter (2401 Locust St) | Quonix Networks, Inc. | 0 | 0 |
From PeeringDB, which is maintained by the network operators present in these buildings rather than by the landlords, which is what makes it worth more than a directory. Two limits. Entries are voluntary, so a building showing no networks may be single tenant or may simply never have registered. And a network being present says nothing about whether the building has space, power or a price for you: that is still a call.
What has been announced in Philadelphia
There is no table here because there is nothing to put in it. As of July 2026 no data center had been proposed inside Philadelphia at all, and the Planning Commission was writing rules ahead of a debate that has not started. The city hosts eight smaller data centers, one of which, at 4775 League Island Boulevard in the Navy Yard, is 25,000 square feet, about a quarter of the size of the smallest building the industry now calls hyperscale. Planners have named two sites large enough to matter if that changes: the 1,300 acre Bellwether District on the old South Philadelphia refinery, and the city owned 2600 Grant Avenue by the airport. The money went to the suburbs and beyond instead, and the fight came with it. PJM’s independent market monitor asked FERC to reject the 23 September 2025 transmission service agreement between PECO and Amazon Data Services, arguing it does not address whether there is sufficient capacity to serve, while the Natural Resources Defense Council estimated PECO could face $9.1 billion in costs by 2033. Read the reporting.
Announced capacity is collected by hand from trade reporting and company statements, and each figure links to the report it came from. It is kept apart from the permit record above and never added to it: one is a document a jurisdiction issued, the other is a plan a company published. Neither is availability.
Announced capacity is collected by hand from trade reporting and company statements, and every figure links to the report it came from and was read in that report before it was written down. It is never added to the interconnection count above: one is a plan a company published, the other is a building a network registered itself into. Neither is availability.
The power fight is real, and it is not being fought over Philadelphia
Pennsylvania sits inside PJM, the largest grid operator in the country, and PJM told stakeholders in August 2025 that it is forecasting peak load growth of 32 gigawatts by 2030. Most of that growth is data centers, and the argument about who pays for it has become the defining energy politics of this state.
The sharpest version of that argument involves the local utility. PJM's independent market monitor asked federal regulators to reject a 23 September 2025 transmission service agreement between PECO and Amazon Data Services, on the grounds that it does not address the key question of whether there is sufficient capacity to serve, and recommended it not be approved unless PECO can demonstrate reliable and economical service. The Natural Resources Defense Council estimated PECO could face 9.1 billion dollars in costs by 2033. Whatever you think of either position, the practical consequence for a buyer is that connecting new large load in this territory is contested, slow and politically expensive.
Amazon's own commitment, at least twenty billion dollars across Pennsylvania and the largest private sector investment in the state's history, is going to Falls Township in Bucks County and Salem Township in Luzerne County. Falls Township is roughly thirty miles from Center City, which puts it in the Philadelphia metro for commuting purposes and outside it for almost every other purpose that matters to a colocation buyer: different municipality, different zoning, different politics and no retail colocation product.
What the city is preparing for
Philadelphia's Planning Commission has named the two sites in the city large enough to host a modern data center if one were ever proposed. The first is the Bellwether District at 3143 West Passyunk Avenue, the former South Philadelphia refinery, roughly 1,300 acres of mostly undeveloped land already zoned industrial. The second is 2600 Grant Avenue, a city owned property near the airport in the Northeast.
The commission's stated concern is employment density. Data centers employ about one worker per 5,000 square feet, which planners put at roughly 13 percent of the jobs a standard warehouse of the same size would carry, against up to 1,500 well paid union construction jobs during the build. That trade-off is the debate every jurisdiction in this region is now having, and Philadelphia is unusual only in having it before anyone has applied.
Where the market actually is, submarket by submarket
401 North Broad Street
The carrier hotel, and by a wide margin the centre of this market. Netrality and Crown Castle both operate inside it and between them it carries the majority of Philadelphia's network presences. If you need carrier choice or a meet-me point in this city, the conversation starts and often ends here.
Center City and University City
Equinix PH1 and a cluster of smaller providers, including 365 Data Centers on Market Street. This is enterprise retail colocation serving the region's universities, hospitals, law firms and financial services, in cabinets and cages rather than in halls.
The Navy Yard and South Philadelphia
A small operating footprint today and the largest theoretical site in the city next door. The existing Navy Yard facility is 25,000 square feet. The Bellwether District beside it is 1,300 acres. Nothing connects those two facts yet.
The Valley Forge and King of Prussia corridor
The western suburbs carry the regional colocation that does not need to be downtown, including TierPoint's Valley Forge site. Better power economics, more space, more parking, less network. It suits disaster recovery and back office loads well.
When this market is right, and when it is the wrong choice
Philadelphia is the right answer when your users, your staff or your regulators are in Philadelphia. For a regional enterprise, a hospital system, a university or a financial services firm that needs low latency to its own offices and a hands-on relationship with its provider, this is a perfectly good market with real carrier choice at 401 North Broad and competent operators around it.
It is also a sensible disaster recovery position for a New York or Northern Virginia primary. It is far enough from both to be independently exposed and close enough to either for synchronous replication to be a live conversation.
It is the wrong choice for anything at scale. There is no wholesale product here, no announced campus inside the city, and no published capacity figure for one. If your requirement is measured in megawatts rather than kilowatts, the honest answer is that you are shopping Northern Virginia, New Jersey or Bucks County, and a broker who answers a Philadelphia search with a Bucks County site should say so plainly rather than let the metro name do the work.
Ask which building, not which market. More than four in ten of this metro's network presences sit in one address on North Broad Street, so a metro-wide network count tells you very little about the building you are being offered. If you are being shown a suburban site, ask directly what carriers are on-net in that specific building and what a cross-connect back to 401 North Broad costs and how long it takes to provision, because that circuit is often the real product. If a site outside the city is being presented as Philadelphia, ask for the municipality by name and check the zoning status yourself: several Bucks and Montgomery County townships are actively rewriting their data center rules right now. On power, ask whether the capacity you need is already energised under an existing PECO service agreement, because new large load in this territory is contested at federal level and there is no timeline you can hold anyone to. And do not pay a premium for proximity to a project that has not been proposed: there is still no data center application inside this city.