Colocation Scout / News & Analysis

Fermi and TensorWave extend Project Matador lease closing to October 31

Fermi says its subsidiary Fermi Campus 1 LLC and TensorWave TEX1, LLC amended their data center lease to move closing from September 30 to October 31, 2026. The company says other lease terms remain unchanged. It is still negotiating a guaranty with an investment-grade counterparty and completing closing conditions. This is an extension of an existing signed agreement, not a new lease or a completed closing. [1]

Fermi and TensorWave extend Project Matador lease closing to October 31
All news & analysisDeals & LeasingCarson County, TexasSigned lease; closing conditions pending

The disclosure and our analysis

Evidence dates

Closing status as of September 22, 2026. Background from the August 10 announcement and the second-quarter SEC report.

Fermi says its subsidiary Fermi Campus 1 LLC and TensorWave TEX1, LLC amended their data center lease to move closing from September 30 to October 31, 2026. The company says other lease terms remain unchanged. It is still negotiating a guaranty with an investment-grade counterparty and completing closing conditions. This is an extension of an existing signed agreement, not a new lease or a completed closing. [1]

What is being delivered

The original announcement locates Project Matador in Carson County, Texas. TensorWave TEX1 is a subsidiary of TensorWave Inc. The project involves a facility supported by 222 MW of total facility power after final phase delivery. That power basis is not critical IT load, and the figure does not establish open inventory for other customers. [2]

Fermi's SEC report describes delivery beginning in late 2027 and continuing into the first quarter of 2028. Those delivery expectations are separate from the October 2026 closing deadline. Moving the closing date does not by itself establish that delivery dates have changed. [3]

Economics and conditions

Fermi reports approximately $6.5 billion in expected revenue over the initial fifteen-year term. The September announcement says closing depends on work letters, guaranties, operating schedules, a service-level agreement, board approvals and sufficient project financing. It does not identify the investment-grade guarantor under negotiation or confirm that those conditions are satisfied. [1]

The SEC report says the initial term begins with the final delivered phase. It distinguishes base rent from fixed power charges, electricity costs and certain taxes. It also describes renewal and expansion options, delay credits and termination rights. The revenue figure excludes renewal terms and expansion. Treating it as a simple all-in rental quote would lose those distinctions. [3]

Colocation Scout buyer analysis

The key lesson is to track signature, closing, delivery and acceptance separately. Each answers a different procurement question. Signature establishes contractual commitments, while unresolved effectiveness conditions can still prevent the lease from commencing. Neither signature nor closing establishes commissioned IT capacity.

For a buyer evaluating a similar development, request a written list of outstanding conditions and the party responsible for each. Match the workload start date to the specific hall's acceptance criteria and contractual delivery remedies. A campus-level completion estimate is insufficient for a phased deployment.

Credit support deserves its own review. Ask which entity guarantees rent, what obligations it covers, and when it becomes enforceable. A parent guaranty and a separate investment-grade rent guaranty should not be assumed to provide identical protection.

Material unknowns

The reviewed September update does not establish completed project financing, finalized guaranty terms, a revised delivery schedule or current leasable capacity. It also does not explain enough of the pricing schedule to derive a comparable rate per kW of IT load. These remain diligence questions, rather than grounds to infer either cancellation or successful completion.

What remains unknown

The September update does not establish completed project financing, finalized guaranty terms, a revised delivery schedule or current leasable capacity. A comparable price per kW of IT load cannot be established from the disclosed revenue and total facility power.

Sources

  1. Fermi via ACCESS Newswire · Published 2026-09-22
  2. Fermi original lease announcement · Published 2026-08-10
  3. Fermi second-quarter 2026 SEC report (reviewed September 24) · Published 2026-09-24

Related reporting

Deals & Leasing

Host Digital lists with a 43 MW Oklahoma lease and a second 16 MW site under negotiation

Host Digital Inc., formerly Healthy Choice Wellness Corp., completed its merger with Host Digital Infrastructure LLC on September 17, 2026. Its Class A stock now trades on NYSE American as HOST. Its only disclosed data center asset is a facility in northeastern Oklahoma leased to a single tenant. [Source 2] [Source 3]

Northeastern Oklahoma · Leased; delivery targeted Q1 2027
Read the analysis
Deals & Leasing

Hyperscale Data targets November for Michigan AI deployment as investment exceeds $70 million

Hyperscale Data says it invested more than $70 million into Alliance Cloud Services and its Michigan facility through September 15. Its September 17 update targets November 2026 for operations under an existing agreement with an unnamed California-based neocloud provider. That is a deployment target, not confirmation that the contracted service is operating. [Source 1]

Michigan, United States · Signed agreement; future deployment
Read the analysis