Colocation Scout / News & Analysis

Clearview evaluates Wood Haven data center site; power demand remains under review

Clearview Dynamics LLC is evaluating Wood Haven Technology Park in Roanoke County, Virginia, for a potential data center. The Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility Authority (WVRIFA), the park's owner, confirmed the proposed use in a September 22 announcement. It expects due diligence to continue through March 2027. This is a site evaluation, not an announcement of operational capacity. [1]

Clearview evaluates Wood Haven data center site; power demand remains under review
All news & analysisDevelopment & PowerRoanoke County, VirginiaUnder evaluation (due diligence expected through March 2027)

The disclosure and our analysis

Evidence dates

Evidence: WVRIFA announcement dated September 22, 2026; WVRIFA motion dated September 11, 2026; Roanoke County project page reviewed September 24, 2026; Virginia Business report dated September 23, 2026.

A potential project in the Roanoke region

Clearview Dynamics LLC is evaluating Wood Haven Technology Park in Roanoke County, Virginia, for a potential data center. The Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility Authority (WVRIFA), the park's owner, confirmed the proposed use in a September 22 announcement. It expects due diligence to continue through March 2027. This is a site evaluation, not an announcement of operational capacity. [1]

Wood Haven sits near the junction of Interstates 81 and 581. Roanoke County is the host locality responsible for zoning and permitting. For buyers tracking development outside Northern Virginia, the location makes this a Roanoke regional project rather than an addition to the Northern Virginia inventory. [3]

What the land action establishes

On September 11, WVRIFA authorized its executive director to finalize development guidelines and execute a purchase and sale agreement. The motion also authorizes the documents needed for a closing. Those authorizations do not establish that the land has changed hands or that construction has been permitted. The motion provides for a residential impact fee program funded from sale proceeds, rather than directly from member localities. [2]

Virginia Business reported on September 23 that the agreement covers 94 acres, based on a redacted agreement obtained by the publication. It reported that the price was redacted. Colocation Scout has not independently reviewed that signed agreement, so the purchase area is attributed to that reporting. No transaction price is established by the sources reviewed here. [4]

The reported purchase area should not be confused with the entire 111-acre park or its 54 acres of graded, pad-ready land described by WVRIFA. None of those acreage measures describes a completed data center footprint or a power allocation. [1, 4]

Power and delivery remain open questions

WVRIFA says project-specific electricity demand is still being evaluated. Its announcement describes engineering, geotechnical, utility and environmental work as part of diligence. The anticipated March 2027 diligence horizon is not a construction completion or customer delivery date. [1]

The authority says Clearview has committed to pay for the project's power, water and associated infrastructure. That statement addresses who would bear costs. It does not establish an executed utility service agreement, a funded construction schedule, or when electrical service could be energized. [1]

As of the September 22 announcement, no project MW figure is disclosed. Consequently, there is no verified critical IT load, utility service capacity or total facility power figure to report. These measures cannot be inferred from acreage or the presence of utilities at the park.

Existing zoning is a separate milestone

WVRIFA states that data center use falls within categories covered by the park's existing zoning and master plan. That is the authority's description of the land-use framework, not evidence that a specific facility has received every required approval. [1]

The county's project page still contains older language saying the prospective use is unconfirmed. Its linked, dated September 22 release explicitly confirms data center evaluation. This article relies on that newer statement for the proposed use. [1, 3]

Buyer analysis: a development lead, not procurement inventory

Wood Haven is worth monitoring as a potential future location. It is too early to count it as space a customer can reserve against a delivery requirement.

A buyer would need project-specific evidence of the utility service quantity and power basis, required upgrades, energization milestones, and responsibility for delays. Subsequent facility plans would also need to establish usable IT capacity, redundancy, cooling configuration and commissioning requirements. A utility connection alone would not answer those questions.

The next useful evidence would be a completed land transaction, project plans, utility commitments and an identified operator or customer offering. None of the reviewed sources establishes customer availability, lease pricing, an anchor tenant, or a service commencement date. Buyers with immediate requirements should continue evaluating facilities with confirmed delivery windows while treating Wood Haven as a longer-term development to watch.

What remains unknown

The reviewed sources do not disclose a project MW figure, a transaction price, an executed utility service agreement, an energization date, an operator or customer offering, lease pricing, an anchor tenant or a service commencement date. The 94 acre purchase area is attributed to Virginia Business reporting on a redacted agreement that Colocation Scout has not reviewed.

Sources

  1. WVRIFA announcement · Published 2026-09-22
  2. WVRIFA motion · Published 2026-09-11
  3. Roanoke County project page · Published 2026-09-24
  4. Virginia Business · Published 2026-09-23

Related reporting

Development & Power

Texas adopts large load grid rules with a $100,000 study fee and $50,000 per MW in security

The Public Utility Commission of Texas has adopted new rule 16 TAC §25.194, setting the standards large loads must meet to connect to the ERCOT grid. The rule implements PURA §37.0561, enacted by Senate Bill 6. The adoption order was filed September 18, 2026. The Texas Register acknowledgment lists an October 2 issue date and an October 8, 2026 effective date. Status: Approved, as an adopted rule not yet in effect as of September 26. [Source 1] [Source 2]

Texas (ERCOT region) · Approved (rule adopted September 18, 2026; effective October 8, 2026)
Read the analysis
Development & Power

Prince William County ends by-right approval for new data centers and rejects the Vint Hill substation

Prince William County's Board of County Supervisors voted 8 to 0 on September 22, 2026 to end by-right data center development for new projects, according to InsideNova and FOX 5 DC. Future data centers will need a special use permit and a board vote. The same day, the board unanimously rejected Dominion Energy's proposed Vint Hill substation expansion, FOX 5 reported. [Source 3] [Source 4]

Prince William County, Virginia · Approved September 22, 2026 per local reports; adopted text not yet posted
Read the analysis
Development & Power

New Era signs a 20-year Vistra power deal for up to 207 MW at its Odessa data center site

New Era Energy & Digital says its subsidiary TCDC PowerCo LLC signed a 20-year power purchase agreement with Luminant ET Services Company LLC, an affiliate of Vistra, on September 18, 2026. Luminant agreed to supply a minimum of 200 MW and up to 207 MW of electric energy for Phase 1 of New Era's Texas Critical Data Center project in Ector County, Texas. [Source 1] [Source 2]

Ector County, Texas, near Vistra's Odessa plant · Power agreement signed; conditions precedent due by December 31, 2027; power expected Q3 2027
Read the analysis