Colocation Scout / News & Analysis

San Antonio now requires a City Council vote on every new data center after a 9-2 code change

San Antonio City Council voted 9-2 on October 29, 2026 to pass data center regulations proposed by District 6 Councilmember Ric Galvan. The approach requires a Specific Use Authorization, a zoning approval voted on by council, for each new data center, rather than allowing data centers by right where they meet set standards. The mayor said the change ensures council can review each data center application. The final signed ordinance was not posted in the sources we reviewed. [Source 1] [Source 2] [Source 4]

San Antonio now requires a City Council vote on every new data center after a 9-2 code change
All news & analysisDevelopment & PowerSan Antonio, Bexar County, Texas (city limits)Approved: City Council passed the data center code change 9-2 on October 29, 2026. Final signed ordinance not reviewed.

Disclosed terms

Council vote
9-2 on October 29, 2026 [1]
Effect
Council reviews each data center application [2]
Approval path
Specific Use Authorization for every proposed data center [4]
Option B
"S" required in every instance, standards tailored per project [5]
Dissent
District 10 Councilman Marc Whyte voted no [3]

The disclosure and our analysis

Evidence dates

Evidence: City of San Antonio news releases of October 29, 2026 (District 6, Mayor, District 10) and October 15, 2026 (District 6); City Council A Session agenda and agenda memorandum for October 29, 2026, file 26-224818, with the published Option B code text. Read November 3, 2026. Status is as of October 29, 2026.

What council decided

The District 6 office says council voted 9-2 to pass Galvan's proposed data center regulations on October 29, a year to the day after his original Council Consideration Request. Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones said the action ensures City Council has the opportunity to review each data center application. District 10 Councilman Marc Whyte voted against the final item and said it goes further than necessary and does not create a standard for businesses to rely on. [Source 1] [Source 2] [Source 3]

Galvan's October 15 release described his approach as requiring that all data centers be granted a Specific Use Authorization zoning designation, giving council a vote on every proposed data center in the city. [Source 4]

The options council had

The October 29 agenda memorandum laid out two staff drafts. Option A would have allowed data centers by right in intense commercial and industrial zones when they meet minimum standards such as distances from homes and schools, with an "S" Specific Use Authorization needed only for projects that do not meet them. Option B would require an "S" in every instance and let council tailor standards to each project. A third option came from the mayor, and the Zoning Commission recommended a combination on October 20. [Source 5]

The published Option B text limits data centers to the C-3, L, BP, I-1, I-2, MI-1 and MI-2 districts, each with a Specific Use Authorization, and lists conditions council may impose, including minimum distances from homes, schools, assisted living and daycare, indoor generators, height limits and setbacks. It also treats a data center as abandoned after three years without operation. [Source 6]

We have not seen the final adopted text, so we cannot confirm which Option B provisions, or any floor amendments, are in the version that passed. The mayor said her proposed provisions on transparency, public health and property values were not included. [Source 2]

Status

On our status vocabulary: the code change is Approved by the San Antonio City Council, 9-2, on October 29, 2026. It is a zoning rule, not a project approval. The reviewed sources do not state the effective date of the signed ordinance or how projects already in the permitting pipeline are treated.

Buyer analysis

This is our analysis. San Antonio has been one of the main Texas data center markets outside Dallas and Austin. Under the new rule, a new data center site in the city needs a zoning case and a council vote, with conditions set project by project. That adds a public hearing step and schedule risk that a by-right path would not.

For buyers, the practical effect is on future supply inside city limits, not on existing facilities. When a provider quotes new San Antonio capacity, ask whether the building already has its zoning, and if not, when its Specific Use Authorization hearing is set. Sites outside city limits, in Bexar County or nearby counties, are not covered by this city code.

What remains unknown

The reviewed sources do not include the final signed ordinance, its effective date, any floor amendments, treatment of existing data centers or projects already under review, or how many pending projects are affected. News reports describe amendments such as limits over the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone; we did not confirm those in a city document.

Sources

  1. City of San Antonio, District 6 news release · Published 2026-10-29
  2. City of San Antonio, Mayor's statement · Published 2026-10-29
  3. City of San Antonio, District 10 news release · Published 2026-10-29
  4. City of San Antonio, District 6 news release · Published 2026-10-15
  5. City of San Antonio, agenda memorandum, file 26-224818, City Council A Session item 5 · Published 2026-10-29
  6. City of San Antonio, Option B data center UDC amendments, agenda attachment · Published 2026-10-29
  7. City of San Antonio, City Council A Session agenda · Published 2026-10-29

Explore the market

Related reporting

Development & Power

Entergy Arkansas plans a second phase of service for Google's West Memphis data center campus, with about $600 million of grid work and a 440 MW solar contract paid for by Google

Entergy Arkansas announced on October 19, 2026 a second phase of electric service for Google's data center campus in West Memphis, Arkansas. The utility says the phase needs about $600 million of planned investment plus a power purchase agreement, all covered by Google: two battery systems, a 440 MW (ac) solar contract, an expanded Galet substation and two new 230 kV lines to serve the expanded campus. The expansion still has to be submitted to the Arkansas Public Service Commission; Entergy targets service in 2028 if it is approved. Entergy listed the expanded Google agreement among its third quarter highlights on November 2. [Source 1] [Source 2]

West Memphis, Crittenden County, Arkansas · Announced October 19, 2026; to be submitted to the Arkansas Public Service Commission for approval. Pending approval, Entergy expects service in 2028. Not approved as of November 2, 2026.
Read the analysis
Development & Power

California ISO's board approves a large load interconnection proposal with a flexible interim service, due at FERC by November 16

The California ISO Board of Governors approved a proposal on October 28, 2026 setting new procedures for connecting large loads such as data centers to its grid. A key element is a flexible interim load interconnection that would let large loads connect to the transmission system with enforceable flexibility until network upgrades are complete. The ISO says it will file the proposal with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission by a November 16 deadline, in response to FERC's June 2026 show cause order on large loads. The rules are not in effect until FERC acts. [Source 1] [Source 2]

California ISO grid; no specific project site · Approved by the California ISO Board of Governors on October 28, 2026 for filing at FERC by November 16, 2026. Not yet accepted by FERC; no effective date in reviewed sources.
Read the analysis
Development & Power

Michigan's attorney general asks regulators to rehear their approval of DTE's 20-year contracts for Google's Van Buren Township data center

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel filed a petition for rehearing on October 30, 2026 in Michigan Public Service Commission case U-22058, where the Commission on October 1 conditionally approved DTE Electric's special contracts to serve a planned Google data center in Van Buren Township that the petition describes as a 1 gigawatt facility. She asks the Commission to require annual reconciliation of costs and benefits, drop a cap on the customer's collateral and order more cost modeling that includes transmission costs, or else reject the contracts. The Commission's approval stands while the petition is pending. [Source 1] [Source 2]

Van Buren Township, Wayne County, Michigan · Approved: MPSC conditionally approved the DTE and Google special contracts on October 1, 2026. Petition for rehearing filed by the Michigan Attorney General on October 30, 2026; pending as of that date. Service expected to begin December 2027, per DTE.
Read the analysis